I know, you know how tricky and sly government can be. D;
I wouldn't trust it for a second.
And yes, it does remind you of that book, doesn't it?
And minority report. D; Except in that, they were actually preventing crime; though, it was a flawed system.
I agree with noirassasin, plus, it might be time consuming as to how they regulate things. Kind of unnecessary too. Security cameras, fine. But iris scans? Really? I can see advantages to it, but that doesn't mean it'll stop crime.
im pretty against it. D: somehow this technology makes me turn to George Orwell's 1984. *reads article* D:
it is a complete breach of privacy. i mean can people turn it off and how do they they know its really off and why are big corporate companies like Bank of America behind this? *suspicious*
i would maybe agree if it were people on probation or criminals. :( but it wouldnt necessarily permanent.
SolemnSerpent
Cupcake Constable (Moderator) | Posted 08/20/10 | Reply
@noirassasin:
I know, you know how tricky and sly government can be. D;
I wouldn't trust it for a second.
And yes, it does remind you of that book, doesn't it?
And minority report. D; Except in that, they were actually preventing crime; though, it was a flawed system.
corn
I'm a veggie, dawg (Otaku Eternal) | Posted 08/18/10 | Reply
I agree with noirassasin, plus, it might be time consuming as to how they regulate things. Kind of unnecessary too. Security cameras, fine. But iris scans? Really? I can see advantages to it, but that doesn't mean it'll stop crime.
noirassasin
Compulsive Dreamer (Otaku Eternal) | Posted 08/18/10 | Reply
im pretty against it. D: somehow this technology makes me turn to George Orwell's 1984. *reads article* D:
it is a complete breach of privacy. i mean can people turn it off and how do they they know its really off and why are big corporate companies like Bank of America behind this? *suspicious*
i would maybe agree if it were people on probation or criminals. :( but it wouldnt necessarily permanent.
[noir]